Nov 1, 2023·edited Nov 1, 2023Liked by Rich Slutzky
The Bidens and Trumps are corrupt, like looking at the hairy arsehole of the USA from different angles. As a foreigner, I feel like a prison guard hoping that no one poops when I say, "Cough!"
I believe in truth and stand against the abuse of power. Trump shouldn't be under scrutiny alone. The Biden's and Burisma should definitely have been investigated, on behalf of the American Public (not Trump). By the same token, if any foreign power ever has evidence of a crime, it shouldn't be illegal for them to present it (but with a proper system in place so that both sides of the political spectrum are informed).
Donald Trump and Joe Biden suck regarding their abuse of Ukraine. The purpose of gaining info shouldn't be for career advancement or the maintaining of power.
As a side, his weight tells me all I need to know about the state of of our military and him.
I'm all for everyone making their own choices but I will judge you if you claim to be protecting me and you look like a fat dweeb in a cap. America t shirt.
I do not know what Substack the company is really up to. Please continue to read my Substack articles and tell me anything I need to know (and do not know). Mike Hampton is one of the best I have seen writing on the Intenet. And, I see him just below! Carry on...
I wanted to comment on Vinmans Substack forum but only paid subscribers could... Thanks for addressing his opinion vs. policy. Trump MAKES policy. Vinman just was a lying vindictive trouble-maker.
My view is actually a little tiny bit different from this one, I mean in terms of what my authority over Substack should or should not be. They own the company. I don't know much about Internet business culture, but it is hard to build a big, successful website --- I guess. Each of us could have our own independent websites, but it seems like we want to do it with some host in charge. I guess switching from one website to another would be annoying. I have read these hopeless establishment losers! There is that woman historian who had a best-seller with some book. She has a million subscribers. This is some Joyce Vance person who sounds like she worked in government, etc. Reich I am thoroughly disenchanted with except that he did allow comments, so I think I may have chimed in a few times to fertilize his nest. So what I can say? Substack can do as they like. Maybe I want to read Joyce Vance every few months, I don't know. And I mean that historian lady is a phenomenon, admit it. All I want is that they will not stop me from doing as I like. So, as long as we get to stay, I will let Substack promote whom they want to; its their operation. I am just an individual, with about 40 persons subscribing and I am happy for that I seem to have about five people (incl. RS, I checked!) who read darned near everything I write. And I don't know if I will continue writing good stuff or I will decline. That is kind of up to me, too, isn't it? I do not tell Substack who to sponsor or tell others how to distribute what passes for "information" in our lying society. I mean --- decide how information gets distributed in a decrepit ramshackle fading formerly free society. It just is not much of my business. I don't follow the "business end" of the platform in any case. I just put up 'Notes' sometimes and hope that works. If anybody reading this wants to visit my site, Well --- it's a free country, ain't it?
The Bidens and Trumps are corrupt, like looking at the hairy arsehole of the USA from different angles. As a foreigner, I feel like a prison guard hoping that no one poops when I say, "Cough!"
I believe in truth and stand against the abuse of power. Trump shouldn't be under scrutiny alone. The Biden's and Burisma should definitely have been investigated, on behalf of the American Public (not Trump). By the same token, if any foreign power ever has evidence of a crime, it shouldn't be illegal for them to present it (but with a proper system in place so that both sides of the political spectrum are informed).
Donald Trump and Joe Biden suck regarding their abuse of Ukraine. The purpose of gaining info shouldn't be for career advancement or the maintaining of power.
Loading “Nat-secstack” in my rhetorical cannon right now.
Nelson-like in it’s impact. Never mind the maneuvers, go straight at them!
Spot on.
As a side, his weight tells me all I need to know about the state of of our military and him.
I'm all for everyone making their own choices but I will judge you if you claim to be protecting me and you look like a fat dweeb in a cap. America t shirt.
REMF.
If you remember, you invoked his name, and now the Devil has appeared. He popped up in my thread as well. Fucking algos.
I do not know what Substack the company is really up to. Please continue to read my Substack articles and tell me anything I need to know (and do not know). Mike Hampton is one of the best I have seen writing on the Intenet. And, I see him just below! Carry on...
I wanted to comment on Vinmans Substack forum but only paid subscribers could... Thanks for addressing his opinion vs. policy. Trump MAKES policy. Vinman just was a lying vindictive trouble-maker.
My view is actually a little tiny bit different from this one, I mean in terms of what my authority over Substack should or should not be. They own the company. I don't know much about Internet business culture, but it is hard to build a big, successful website --- I guess. Each of us could have our own independent websites, but it seems like we want to do it with some host in charge. I guess switching from one website to another would be annoying. I have read these hopeless establishment losers! There is that woman historian who had a best-seller with some book. She has a million subscribers. This is some Joyce Vance person who sounds like she worked in government, etc. Reich I am thoroughly disenchanted with except that he did allow comments, so I think I may have chimed in a few times to fertilize his nest. So what I can say? Substack can do as they like. Maybe I want to read Joyce Vance every few months, I don't know. And I mean that historian lady is a phenomenon, admit it. All I want is that they will not stop me from doing as I like. So, as long as we get to stay, I will let Substack promote whom they want to; its their operation. I am just an individual, with about 40 persons subscribing and I am happy for that I seem to have about five people (incl. RS, I checked!) who read darned near everything I write. And I don't know if I will continue writing good stuff or I will decline. That is kind of up to me, too, isn't it? I do not tell Substack who to sponsor or tell others how to distribute what passes for "information" in our lying society. I mean --- decide how information gets distributed in a decrepit ramshackle fading formerly free society. It just is not much of my business. I don't follow the "business end" of the platform in any case. I just put up 'Notes' sometimes and hope that works. If anybody reading this wants to visit my site, Well --- it's a free country, ain't it?